Online Edition                                                                                                                                  



 

Residents dominate Plymouth Rubber hearing after no-show

By Jay Turner
Citizen Staff

Planning Board Chairman Jeremy Comeau accomplished one of his two goals Wednesday night.

Just as he had hoped and called for, more than 50 residents and town officials showed up at Town Hall on June 11 for a hearing on an industrial subdivision plan, filed by the owners of the Plymouth Rubber property.

The owners themselves or their engineers, however, did not, forcing the board to postpone what it had expected would be a discussion of four requested waivers, and ultimately a vote, until a meeting scheduled for July 2.

Promoted heavily by Comeau for weeks, the hearing was billed as a landmark event that would go a long way in deciding the future of the property, and by extension, the fate of the historic Revere barn and rolling mill. But the meeting quickly morphed into a citizens’ forum after Napleton attorney Paul Schneiders informed board members that his clients would need more time to respond to a lengthy report prepared by the town’s engineer.

Schneiders called the report, which he said included 104 questions for his client’s engineers, “very, very, very extensive” and the largest he has seen in his 40 years as a zoning attorney. He said it would not have been professional for the engineers, from the firm VHB, to provide answers “off the top of their heads,” and requested that they be given an extension until June 23.  

Both Comeau and Planning Board Clerk George Jenkins were offended by their absence, however, with Jenkins calling it “presumptuous” and Comeau calling it unfair to the citizens who came out to ask questions.

Yet dozens still stepped up to the microphone, including Comeau’s brother and historical commissioner, George Comeau, who garnered a loud applause after speaking out against the possibility of losing the historic buildings. 

“The rest of the country looks to us now to see what we’re going to do with this site,” he said, “and that flag would not be hanging on that wall but for the patriots that fought the American Revolution and built this country and left a legacy.”

Those who followed Comeau also addressed the Revere buildings, including Wallace Gibbs, the chairman of the Historical Commission, and fellow commissioner Patricia Johnson, who demanded that the Planning Board “take every possible measure available” to ensure the buildings are saved.  

“They are a national treasure,” Johnson said. “They are of national importance.”

Schneiders, meanwhile, defended his clients at every turn, insisting that they have the same respect for American history that people in Canton have. He noted that Napleton had promised to spend $2 million to preserve the structures as part of its proposed mixed-use development — that is, until the town chose to keep the site zoned for industrial uses.

“We worked our tails off,” Schneiders said at one point, referring to the residential/retail project. “We put our hearts into it, to try to sell what we thought was one of the most beautiful dreams that Canton’s ever had, and we just didn’t get a two-thirds vote [at town meeting].

“So there’s no spite. There’s no hard feelings. There’s nobody mad at anybody. It’s just reality. It’s an industrial piece of land. That’s what the town meeting said it should stay, and that’s what we’re trying to market it as.”

Schneiders wasn’t the only one to bring up the town meeting decision, either. Despite repeated attempts by Jeremy Comeau to keep the discussion focused on the subdivision proposal, many speakers seemed more interested in the possibility of “going back to the table” to get another residential development approved.

Comeau himself said he would “go back tomorrow morning,” as did Jenkins, although Jenkins said it would require a four-fifths approval from the Planning Board if the plan was substantially similar to the original.

“I’d be more than willing to go back to the table,” Jenkins said, “but I am not ready to do another 18 months of futility, and that’s what it turned out to be. We got agreements up and down the line, and it was washed down the toilet.”

Addressing the failed rezoning attempt, resident Lindsay McHugh somewhat defended Napleton, noting that she was originally from the owners’ home state of Illinois, where she has seen some of the “wonderful” work they have done.

“Who can blame them at this point when we have snubbed our noses at the only idea that has come forth?” McHugh said.

 One resident who did propose a new idea was Marcy Venezia, who cited a track record of “out-of-the-box thinking.” She suggested that residents have a kind of competition, in which they develop plans for mixed-uses and then present them to the owners in a science-fair format.

Despite numerous remarks, however, some critical and some more optimistic, Schneiders continually went back to the same point — that his clients tried, but unfortunately failed.

“All I know is, my people don’t have the heart, they don’t have the spirit, they don’t have the money to come back,” he said. “They’ve got to cut their losses.”

“There’s no good guys at town meeting and there’s no bad guys at town meeting,” he later added. “There’s just difference of opinion. And all these people are trying to do is save their shirt. They gambled on something and they lost big-time. Now they’re stuck with a big, ugly, contaminated piece of property that they spent $8 million on and they don’t know what to do with.” 

Schneiders also reminded the audience that Napleton, while hoping to sell the property, does not intend to sell it to six different buyers, as is outlined in the subdivision plan. They are only requesting it, he said, because that is the way the state allows an owner to freeze the industrial use for eight years, so as to prevent the town from rezoning it “out from under them.”

As for the waivers they are requesting, which represent the only leverage the Planning Board has in the approval process, the board had previously opposed three of the four in an informal vote, and will vote again on July 2.

Schneiders said Wednesday night that he did not expect them to be approved.



June 19, 2008
 

Return to Past Articles Page

 

 

 

 

 

  Canton Citizen     Canton, Massachusetts 02021